I'm using Rider to develop a C# application that uses ASP.Net to create a simple web application. From inside the IDE, I can run and I get what I expect: A command-line application that runs in the ...
User kokos answered the wonderful Hidden Features of C# question by mentioning the using keyword. Can you elaborate on that? What are the uses of using?
The Using scope modifier is supported in the following contexts: Remotely executed commands, started with Invoke-Command using the ComputerName, HostName, SSHConnection or Session parameters (remote session) Background jobs, started with Start-Job (out-of-process session) Thread jobs, started via Start-ThreadJob or ForEach-Object -Parallel ...
Not using by means that the technology used is incidental, and the focus is on the approach being shown to be feasible. Without more context it's impossible to say what the intended import of the sentence is and whether by would actually be better or not. And that means that this question is Not A Real Question.
By using a joystick or a pointing device, an on-screen keyboard allows people with mobility impairments to type data. The second sentence states that the on-screen keyboard is the one that uses the joystick or pointing device to allow impaired people to type data.
Yes Yes. Either way, when the using block is exited (either by successful completion or by error) it is closed. Although I think it would be better to organize like this because it's a lot easier to see what is going to happen, even for the new maintenance programmer who will support it later:
c# - in a "using" block is a SqlConnection closed on return or ...
Using the using keyword can be useful. Using using helps prevent problems using exceptions. Using using can help you use disposable objects more usefully. Using a different using helps you use namespaces or type names. Quite useful.
Updating the using keyword was specifically for templates, and (as was pointed out in the accepted answer) when you are working with non-templates using and typedef are mechanically identical, so the choice is totally up to the programmer on the grounds of readability and communication of intent.
I have seen numerous sentences in which placement of the word "using" immediately following a noun causes just such ambiguity as in the first sentence. In some cases, introduction of extra verbiage such as "through the use of" or "by using" helps. In other cases, it is best to rewrite to avoid confusion and obtain a clearer, more concise sentence.
"The use of" vs. "using" - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
I had been using cocaine. Meaning, with a reference point in the past, starting a time before then up to the reference point, I was habitually using cocaine up to and including that point. Why not put in some other wonky tenses? I will have used cocaine. I will have been using cocaine. Here is a link conjugating it in all its tenseful glory.
grammar - 'I was using', 'I have used', 'I have been using', 'I had ...
Usage using-directives for namespaces and using-declarations for namespace members using-declarations for class members
Using-declaration Introduces a name that is defined elsewhere into the declarative region where this using-declaration appears. See using enum and (since C++20) using namespace for other related declarations.
Using-declarations Introduces a name that is defined elsewhere into the declarative region where this using-declaration appears.
See also Concepts TS Named requirements Requires expression (C++20) yields a prvalue expression of type bool that describes the constraints [edit] Categories: Pages using deprecated source tags Pages using deprecated enclose attributes Todo with reason
See also C documentation for C keywords Categories: Pages using deprecated source tags Pages using deprecated enclose attributes
Attempts to allocate requested number of bytes, and the allocation request can fail (even if the requested number of bytes is zero). These allocation functions are called by new expressions to allocate memory in which new object would then be initialized. They may also be called using regular function call syntax.
There is no automated way to add animated profile picture on Gmail. You’d first need to create the GIF by using online tools like remove.bg and Canva, and then upload that GIF as your profile picture ...
Business Insider: Updating my dating profiles using basic marketing principles got me more matches. Here's how to do it.
Updating my dating profiles using basic marketing principles got me more matches. Here's how to do it.
HBO Max keeps the process of adding and editing new profiles simple. The amount of content HBO Max has, and the stark differences in the types of shows and movies you can find on the streamer make ...
"Using this approach, you can easily switch between workspaces and always have VS Code configured the right way." Profiles can be customized for things like demos, education (ease the use in a ...
Instantly find the exact current time for any city, country, or time zone with Time.so. Our accurate, real-time world clocks, time zone converters, and event planners make navigating global time simple and effortless.
Nieman Journalism Lab: A complimentary profile that was “surprisingly difficult to publish”
How do I grant all the power users on our Server 2003 network the ability to install and remove programs as well as use of the system configuration utility (= run-> ms config)? They need these local rights on their workstations (XP and Vista). Either by using a "NET LOCALGROUP" startup script or with Restricted Groups in Group Policy.
Not using by means that the technology used is incidental, and the focus is on the approach being shown to be feasible. Without more context it's impossible to say what the intended import of the sentence is and whether by would actually be better or not.
Update May 2018. As many noted in the comments that using SHA-2 does not add any security to a self-signed certificate. But I still recommend using it as a good habit of not using outdated / insecure cryptographic hash functions. Full explanation is available in Why is it fine for certificates above the end-entity certificate to be SHA-1 based?.